Monthly Archive for March, 2007

Page 3 of 3

Openness needed in Jerusalem’s antiquities

I’ve been keeping an open mind about the recent controversy over construction work near the Mughrabi Gate in Jerusalem [BBC News]. Although it is difficult to keep an open mind when you recall that it was around this time last time last year that the Simon Wiesenthal Centre started constructing their Museum of “Tolerance” on an Arab cemetery [BBC News].

Nevertheless it seems to me that the main problem with archaeological work in Jerusalem is a fundamental lack of trust between the various parties such that no-one has faith in the intentions of the other. So I was intrigued to see this Ynetnews report: Muslim prayer room found near Mugrabi Gate. From the article:

Remains of an ancient Muslim prayer room were found under the dirt embankment adjacent to the Mugrabi Gate in 2004, yet the findings, unearthed after part of the embankment collapsed into the Western Wall compound, were kept secret until now.

The remains apparently date back to the 11th century, the Salah al-Din era known as the Ayub Period and which is of great significance to the Muslim world. This important finding was kept secret in fear that the Muslim community would demand that the site, adjacent to the Western Wall compound, be declared sacred.

One of the Muslim arguments regarding the works taking place near the Mugrabi Bridge is that the destruction of the embankment would damage Muslim sites. The findings published by the Antiquities Authority are likely to support this argument.

Given the all-round problem with trust it seems astonishing that the Israel Antiquities Authority kept these details secret. A little more openness and a collaborative approach with all interested parties may well have calmed fears and avoided an unnecessary dispute.

Spam Warriors

Gordon Dick has published a new web site: Scotch Spam, documenting his recent legal win against a company for sending him spam email, under EU and UK law. Unfortunately, if you read Gordon’s (long) story you will find that whilst court awarded him £1368.66, plus statutory interest, he has yet to see a penny. The company he prosecuted has ceased trading and been replaced with another that shares the same, lone director…

Nigel Roberts had somewhat better luck [spamlegalaction.co.uk]. Whilst he settled out of court for only £300 with his spammer, he did at least get paid.

Both web sites are an invaluable guide for any budding spam warrior hoping to make use of Europe’s relatively young spam laws. Unfortunately the time involved is all rather tedious, and impractical for most of us, given the volume of spam we receive. Nevertheless a few more cases could help move things forward a bit: especially if someone manages to successfully sue a spammer’s ISP for tolerating their activities. When it is ISP’s financial interests to actually deal with spam, we might finally get SMTP [wikipedia] overhauled.

Source: Scotsman wins £1,300 settlement against spammer [The Register]

Portillo on Tory inadequacy

I have a lot of time for Michael Portillo’s political analysis. In today’s Sunday Times he argues that Gordon Brown is still most likely to win the next general election. I do agree with him on that. More important however was his articulation of some of the inadequacies of today’s Conservative leadership.

Today’s Tory team lacks strength in depth. George Osborne is good but not yet weighty. David Davis is substantial, but is not part of Cameron’s project to transform the party. David Willetts and Oliver Letwin lack any sort of common touch. There is no Campbell or Mandelson. There is no Norman Tebbit either. The Conservatives have yet to find a person or a device to attract back the working-class voters who were an essential part of Thatcher’s winning coalition.

The party has chosen in Cameron the nearest thing that it has to Blair, rightly because the Tories needed to change as much as Blair changed Labour. But the prime minister is the better chameleon. Somehow he appears classless despite his public school education. Cameron will always be viewed as a toff, even though he communicates well with every group of voters. Without an unforeseeable breakthrough, the Conservatives cannot be sure of retaking Essex or the cities in Yorkshire and Lancashire that stuck with Thatcher.

Read the full article: Great polls, shame about your election chances, Mr Cameron [TimesOnline].